[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Are Green OA Self-Archiving Mandates Maoist Monstrosities?
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Are Green OA Self-Archiving Mandates Maoist Monstrosities?
- From: Stevan Harnad <email@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 22:17:53 EST
- Reply-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Sender: email@example.com
Apparently those who lived in or near the Soviet Fortress for many years were (understandably) so traumatized by it that they can now no longer distinguish between the abuses and absurdities of Bolshevik control and genuinely beneficial rules. It might help if Jan contemplated whether the longstanding publish-or-perish mandate (which ensures that researchers bother to publish at all) is likewise a Maoist aberration... (or, for that matter, anti-smoking and pro-seatbelt rules...)
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, Jan Szczepanski wrote:
In his latest talk with with prominent open access advocates Richard Poynder is talking to Dr Alma Swan. It's a fascinating and scary picture that is presented. In the late fifties Mao Zedong introduced that Great Leap and now fifty years later we are going to take a giant leap according to Dr Swan. In China backyard steel furnances would do the job; in Dr Swans world it's the mandate and local institutional repository that is going to change the world away from big industry and the capitalist society. Open Access is inevitable according to Dr Swan, as once Socialism was. Mandate is the key to the Open Access World. Instead of Five Year Plans we will have Metrics to see to it that the way forward is the Green Way. The commissars overlooking that the Giant Leap will happen is "Pro-Vice- Chancellors" at the universities, the real reprsentatives of the research communities. A citatation from Wikipedia: These reforms (sometimes now referred to as /The Little Leap Forward/) were generally unpopular with the peasants and usually implemented by summoning them to meetings and making them stay there for days and sometimes weeks until they "voluntarily" agreed to join the collective. A citation by Dr Swan: AS: Mandates are essential for lots of reasons. One reason is that they make researchers aware of Open Access where they weren't before. The level of ignorance is still very high. And if their university suddenly requires them to do something it will focus researchers' minds. More mportantly, of course, a mandate will actually make them do it, because regardless of the Open Access Advantage, they won't put their research into a repository if they don't have to. It's another bureaucratic thing to do. And they still have worries about the legality of it. Being told by their institution to do it gives them the feeling that it is safe and sensible to do it. So to make them do it you need to tell them that they have to! Richard Poynder's comment: Dr Swan has a clear eye for what is needed How will the future be? AS: Once the content and the infrastructure are in place we are going to see knowledge take a giant leap. The way to view it is that the last 7-8,000 years or so of human civilisation's struggle for knowledge has taken place on one plane, determined and constrained by what our own brains can absorb, put together and make sense of: now we are about to move to another plane altogether, with the help of machine brains.From profit makers to machine brains, what a future!Jan Jan Szczepanski Forste bibliotekarie Goteborgs universitetsbibliotek E-mail: Jan.Szczepanski@ub.gu.se
- Prev by Date: Re: European Research Council Mandate Green OA Self-Archiving
- Next by Date: Re: European Research Council Mandate Green OA Self-Archiving
- Previous by thread: Re: Are Green OA Self-Archiving Mandates Maoist Monstrosities?
- Next by thread: Position Announcement - Welch Medical Library, Johns Hopkins U