[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Orphans, etc.
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Orphans, etc.
- From: Wilhelmina Randtke <randtke@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 19:59:42 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Here's to Sandy's pick, but moreso to the concept of picking books more closely related to list topics. It takes so long to read a book, that I tend to read an almost equal volume of book reviews to better target my reading. -Wilhelmina Randtke On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Sandy Thatcher < sandy.thatcher@alumni.princeton.edu> wrote: > I think it's a good idea, too, but i would urge that books be > chosen that more obviously and directly address issues of > interest to people subscribed to this list. One such new book > (which i am currently reviewing for the Journal of Scholarly > Publishing) is Kathleen Fitzpatrick's "Planned Obsolescence" > (NYU Press, 2011): > > http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/kathleen-fitzpatrick/ > > It would actually be quite appropriate to offer this book for > "post-publication" crowd review because the manuscript was > posted for pre-publication crowd review as an experiment, given > that one of its main topics is the need to change how peer > review works. > > Sandy Thatcher > > >>I'm in. How do you want to organize it? >> >>Scott >>T. Scott Plutchak >>Director, Lister Hill Library of the Health Sciences >>University of Alabama at Birmingham >>tscott@uab.edu >> >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu >>[mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Joseph >>Esposito >>Sent: Friday, November 04, 2011 8:21 PM >>To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu >>Subject: Re: Orphans, etc. >> >>We could help to resolve a great number of disputes on this list >>if we were to participate in a Liblicense Reading Group in which >>we attempted to find titles to read together that would appeal >>to a broad number of listmembers. I think we would find great >>congruence in sensibility among people who argue vigorously with >>one another about other issues. Why focus on what we disagree >>on rather than on those things where we speak with one mind? >> >>My first nominee is "A Novel Bookstore" (fiction) by Laurence >>Cosse, published by Europa Editions. >> >>Joe Esposito
- Prev by Date: RE: Orphans, etc.
- Next by Date: Liblicense reading group
- Previous by thread: RE: Orphans, etc.
- Next by thread: Retirement Day for John Cox
- Index(es):