[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Legal Deposit Libraries Act
- To: "Liblicense" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: Legal Deposit Libraries Act
- From: "Sally Morris \(ALPSP\)" <sally.morris@alpsp.org>
- Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 16:21:07 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
For links to more background on the UK's Legal Deposit Libraries Act see http://www.alpsp.org/htp_dep.htm Sally Sally Morris, Chief Executive Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers South House, The Street, Clapham, Worthing, West Sussex BN13 3UU, UK Email: sally.morris@alpsp.org ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joseph J. Esposito" <espositoj@gmail.com> To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu> Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 11:04 PM Subject: Legal Deposit Libraries Act
There is an opinion piece in the Guardian by Nigel Newton, head of Bloomsbury Publishing, in which Newton excoriates Google for the Google Print for Libraries project. While Newton says nothing that would be news to members of this list, he makes a reference to the Legal Deposit Libraries Act that is unfamiliar to me:
"And because they [participating libraries] are copyright libraries, publishers are obliged by the Legal Deposit Libraries Act to give one copy of each book to those six copyright libraries for free. No one ever said it could be passed on in electronic form to a third party."
Can anyone shed light on this? Is the Act a UK thing, American, something besides (Ruritanian?)? The URL is http://books.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,,1722888,00.html, and the piece is entitled "Google's Literary Land-grab."
Joe Esposito
- Prev by Date: University of Michigan Library Seeks IP Rights Specialist
- Next by Date: ALA Preconference on Licensing
- Previous by thread: RE: Legal Deposit Libraries Act
- Next by thread: CrossRef Web Services market survey
- Index(es):