[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Clinical Emergency Clause
- To: "'liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu'" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Clinical Emergency Clause
- From: "Mcsean, Tony (ELS)" <T.Mcsean@elsevier.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 18:44:12 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I'm not aware of any such a thing happening, but then the UK a little less litigious than the US. As director of the BMA Library, I took a lot of care and advice in drawing up a set of terms and conditions of service and of getting them approved by committee. The terms committed library staff to no more than using their best efforts to use the best and most current resources. It was (and still is under my successor) an absolute no-no for staff to do anything which might be interpreted as giving medical advice or interpreting a written source. The possible consequences of that, legal and medical, are obvious and too horrible to contemplate (not least as library drector being flung by senior management from a high window and thinking to onesself "fair enough" on the way down). In fact, emergency, screamingly urgent requests for information are less frequent in clinical libraries than you might imagine. The BMA offers a "drop everything" level of response where the information is required urgently, but this is rarely taken up even though as a mostly secondary referral service you might expect timescales to be shorter than normal. Most medical libraries of any size have an equivalent of the librarian reading the textbook/paper down the phone to a scrubbed-up surgeon who is listening with one finger on the artery (or whatever). But these stories tend to have the air of if not legendary or apocryphal then at least the not-lost-anything-by-constant-retelling. On the other hand, when faced with someone who is genuinely in imminent danger of dying and you can do something to help, it's probably best not to adopt too rigidly legalistic a frame of mind. We Stop You Dying (terms and conditions apply) isn't much of an ethical code. Tony Tony McSe�n Director of Library Relations Elsevier +44 7795 960516 +44 1865 843630 -----Original Message----- [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Bolick, Bob Sent: 15 March 2005 02:19 To: Joseph Esposito; liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: RE: Clinical Emergency Clause Hmm, and I wonder if any health professional has ever been slapped with a malpractice suit for a bad outcome due to having to wait for docdel to deliver "clinical emergency" content? (Just keep the pressure on that; the Fedex man is on his way.) Somewhat apropos, I happen to overhear at my public library a librarian refusing to provide assistance to a patron in interpreting a medical reference. She explained that it was library and municipal policy to avoid suits for bad advice. So in the frivolous case above, would the library have an exposure if it sent "almost the right" article? Robert Bolick Vice President Global Business Planning McGraw-Hill Education 2 Penn Plaza, 25th Floor, New York, NY 10121 (O) 212.904.5934 (M) 646.431.8121 IM: bobb@nexus.eppg.com IM: b6b2y@aol.com Internet ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.1570/b01b01b
- Prev by Date: Electronic Signature
- Next by Date: Reminder: Ensuring Long-term Preservation and Adding Value to Scientific and Technical data (PV 2005)
- Previous by thread: Re: Clinical Emergency Clause
- Next by thread: 3 Day Course in Document Imaging and Document Management: Spring 2005, Summer 2005
- Index(es):