[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Clinical Emergency Clause
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: Clinical Emergency Clause
- From: "Dave Fisher" <Dave@library.ucsd.edu>
- Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 19:33:54 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Julie, Assuming there may be a bona fide situation where your scenario might present itself - it would most certainly be a rarity - wouldn't pay-per-view be a faster, fairer and more appropriate solution? From the publisher's point of view you're asking them to insert a trojan horse into their definition of authorized users. Barring an act of terrorism, a self-declared "clinical emergency" should not be an excuse to waive rights of access simply because the information happens to be available online to authorized users. I can't imagine how one could frame the argument to make the terms of access conditional. Dave Fisher Electronic Resources Licensing UCSD Libraries Univ of Calif San Diego Phone: (858) 822-1004 Fax: (858) 534-1256 dfisher@ucsd.edu
- Prev by Date: Dlib Report on Berlin 3 on Open Access to appear today
- Next by Date: SERIALS, Table of Contents March 2005
- Previous by thread: Re: Clinical Emergency Clause
- Next by thread: RE: Clinical Emergency Clause
- Index(es):