[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Clarification (RE: "Fair Use" Is Getting Unfair Treatment)
- To: "Hamaker, Chuck" <cahamake@email.uncc.edu>, <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Clarification (RE: "Fair Use" Is Getting Unfair Treatment)
- From: "Rick Anderson" <rickand@unr.edu>
- Date: Sat, 25 May 2002 12:10:42 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
> Rick's response below is the argument used by the intellectual property > industry. Geez, that must mean that I sometimes agree with, er, the "intellectual property industry" (but weren't we referring to it as the Copyright Empire?). I guess I'd better turn in my ALA membership card. Oh wait, that's right -- they came and took it away long ago. I don't get it back until John N. Berry III signs my Reeducation Certificate. > You bought this to play on a CD player and got home and learned that it > wouldn't work on the one you have because that's how I designed it-- Why > that's too bad. So is it your argument that if one company tries to protect its intellectual property by means of a harebrained and easily-circumvented encoding strategy, that proves the DMCA is invalid? It doesn't seem to me like the conclusion follows from the premise, but I may be missing part of the argument. Let me reiterate: I'm not necessarily a supporter of the DMCA, especially in its present form. But I do think publishers in the online environment face a serious and legitimate problem in the protection of their copyrights. If I figure out a way to hack past the security measures of a pricey database and I distribute the hacking instructions to the world, what recourse does the copyright holder have without the DMCA (or something like it)? Theoretically, the copyright holder could wait for others to hack in and take content illegally and then pursue them individually under copyright law, but let's be serious: that's no protection at all. For the sake of argument, let's grant that the DMCA is stupid and wrong and fascist. What's a better alternative? I bet there is one, but what is it and who is proposing it? ------------- Rick Anderson Director of Resource Acquisition The University Libraries University of Nevada, Reno "That wasn't a Freudian slip; 1664 No. Virginia St. it was a Jungian slip." Reno, NV 89557 -- Dr. Katz PH (775) 784-6500 x273 FX (775) 784-1328 rickand@unr.edu
- Prev by Date: Negotiating with the Library of Congress
- Next by Date: Re: Clarification (RE: "Fair Use" Is Getting Unfair Treatment)
- Prev by thread: RE: Clarification (RE: "Fair Use" Is Getting Unfair Treatment)
- Next by thread: Re: Clarification (RE: "Fair Use" Is Getting Unfair Treatment)
- Index(es):