[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Negotiating with the Library of Congress
- To: "Liblicense-L@Lists. Yale. Edu" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Negotiating with the Library of Congress
- From: "Rick Anderson" <rickand@unr.edu>
- Date: Sat, 25 May 2002 12:07:13 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I'm in the middle of a rather frustrating license negotiation with the Library of Congress. We want to purchase a copy of the new Classification Web product, and I find the license to be unusually restrictive and inappropriate on several points (institutional assumption of all responsibility for patron behavior, utter lack of any warranty, etc.). This surprises and disappoints me, since this is, you know, the Library of Congress I'm dealing with, but what's even more surprising and disappointing is LC's stated unwillingness to alter the license terms in any way ("In keeping with a policy to maintain a standard customer license," as if standard licenses were some kind of absolute good). Has anyone had more success than I in negotiating with LC? And if not, should we consider giving that institution some kind of public award for being less reasonable than most commercial publishers in its licensing policies? ------------- Rick Anderson Director of Resource Acquisition The University Libraries University of Nevada, Reno "That wasn't a Freudian slip; 1664 No. Virginia St. it was a Jungian slip." Reno, NV 89557 -- Dr. Katz PH (775) 784-6500 x273 FX (775) 784-1328 rickand@unr.edu
- Prev by Date: RE: Clarification (RE: "Fair Use" Is Getting Unfair Treatment)
- Next by Date: RE: Clarification (RE: "Fair Use" Is Getting Unfair Treatment)
- Prev by thread: WHO-HINARI project expands
- Next by thread: Re: Negotiating with the Library of Congress
- Index(es):