[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Clarification (RE: "Fair Use" Is Getting Unfair Treatment)
- To: "'Rick Anderson'" <rickand@unr.edu>, liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: RE: Clarification (RE: "Fair Use" Is Getting Unfair Treatment)
- From: "Hamaker, Chuck" <cahamake@email.uncc.edu>
- Date: Sat, 25 May 2002 12:00:50 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Rick's response below is the argument used by the intellectual property industry. It doesn't make much sense to me. You bought this to play on a CD player and got home and learned that it wouldn't work on the one you have because that's how I designed it-- Why that's too bad. (usually you can't return them once they've been opened). Marking the rim with colored ink makes it usable in your CD player--Go to jail. What house have you broken into with your magic marker? Why is this action subject to a criminal penalty? You just wanted to play it on your player, and I will put you in jail if what you bought from me is played on a gizmo I don't approve of. This law is nonsensical and designed by a buncha people who not only want you to buy their product, but want to put you in jail if you use it! Chuck -----Original Message----- From: Rick Anderson [mailto:rickand@unr.edu] Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 1:59 PM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Cc: Hamaker, Chuck Subject: RE: Clarification (RE: "Fair Use" Is Getting Unfair Treatment) > If the database owner has taken technological steps to restrict me from > fair use actions, then it is illegal to circumvent those technological > protections in order to make fair use of the content of the database. IT > is illegal to circumvent adobe's security even if the use I want to make > of the content is legal. Right. It's also illegal for you to break into my house, even if all you want to do is copy a page from my phonebook. Your proposed use of the information is fair; your proposed mode of access is not. Now: should publishers be allowed to lock up information the same way I'm allowed to lock up my house? I don't know. That's a tough one. > That is what the DMCA does, removes the test of > fair use from the equation. That's not the same thing as changing the criteria for fair use. Fair use guidelines say what you can do once you get your hands on the content; the DMCA says that not all ways of getting your hands on the content are OK. (I'm not arguing that the DMCA is a good law, just pointing out the difference between laws that regulate modes of access and laws that regulate one's use of the content once it's accessed.) ------------- Rick Anderson rickand@unr.edu
- Prev by Date: Re: Clarification (RE: "Fair Use" Is Getting Unfair Treatment)
- Next by Date: Negotiating with the Library of Congress
- Prev by thread: Re: Clarification (RE: "Fair Use" Is Getting Unfair Treatment)
- Next by thread: RE: Clarification (RE: "Fair Use" Is Getting Unfair Treatment)
- Index(es):