[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Clarification (RE: "Fair Use" Is Getting Unfair Treatment)
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Clarification (RE: "Fair Use" Is Getting Unfair Treatment)
- From: David Dorman <ddorma@ltnet.ltls.org>
- Date: Sun, 26 May 2002 17:15:15 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Rick Anderson wrote: >For the sake of argument, let's grant that the DMCA is >stupid and wrong and fascist. What's a better alternative? >I bet there is one, but what is it and who is proposing it? OK Rick I'll bite. The better alternative would have been not to have passed the DMCA and not to have made software code patentable. At this point a better alternative would be for the Supreme Court to declare the DMCA unconstitutional, for Congress to pass two laws: one that replicates the Right of First Sale for leased information, and another declaring software code to be a form of speech, to which all rights of freedom of speech apply. There are several factors which need to be kept in mind with regard to the DMCA. One is that few if any publishers are selling digitally based information any more. It is universally being leased. This replaces the First Sale Doctrine with contract law. We need a law that replicates the Right of Fist Sale for information that is leased to the general public under contract law. Rest assured that information providers will quickly find a way to control the distribution of information within the restrictions of such a law. It is amazing what people with a profit motive can accomplish. Another factor is that the Supreme Court has held that software is patentable. By making software patentable, our rights to the code as speech are effectively taken away. This ruling is not only deeply flawed logically, it is becoming a disaster for freedom of expression, for innovation, and for economic freedom. The posting of a Secure Digital Music Initiative hack could only be considered illegal if the hack is not considered a form of speech, and protected as such. The better alternatives will not be easily accomplished, but they are there. Personally, I find all the struggles against content control refreshing, and I applaud them. David -- David Dorman Consultant, Lincoln Trail Libraries Contributing Editor, American Libraries 217-352-0047 (work) 217-344-2174 (home) 217-352-7153 (fax)
- Prev by Date: RE: Clarification (RE: "Fair Use" Is Getting Unfair Treatment)
- Next by Date: International Summer School on the Digital Library
- Prev by thread: RE: Clarification (RE: "Fair Use" Is Getting Unfair Treatment)
- Next by thread: RE: Clarification (RE: "Fair Use" Is Getting Unfair Treatment)
- Index(es):