[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Congratulations to AAAS (and a few others)
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: Congratulations to AAAS (and a few others)
- From: "John Cox" <John.E.Cox@btinternet.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Sep 1999 15:11:58 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
David Goodman is unfair on scholarly journal publishers who operate subscription period geared to the calendar year. The January 1 start date is traditional in journal publishing simply because that is what the academic library community has required since journals became a significant communications medium for research in the 40s and 50s. The system of volume/issue/calendar year is all of a piece. And libraries want complete volumes, don't they? In fact, most periodical publishers - popular magazines, trade and technical magazines, and journals with a significant individual customer base - all operate on an 'any time start' basis. Scholarly journals don't, simply because libraries want the calendar year. Just to emphasise the point, I remember that, during my days in the early 1990s as head of Blackwell's subscription agency, periodicals with any time starts caused great problems for libraries. They were a significant part of our customer service activity. If librarians require change to an any time start pattern, publishers will provide it - though it cannot happen overnight because most journal publishers' subscription management systems are geared to the calendar year. But I suspect David is in a minority. John Cox -----Original Message----- From: David Goodman <dgoodman@Princeton.EDU> To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu> Date: 14 September 1999 00:32 Subject: Congratulations to AAAS (and a few others) >Mike is of course totally correct that Science is among the few scholarly >publications that is available on other than a calendar year basis. (The >Nature group of titles is another prominent one; so are some medical >journals.) In his enlightened position he may not be aware of just how >inflexible most publishers are, at least with respect to scholarly science >and technology titles. > >-- >David Goodman >Biology Librarian, and >Co-Chair, Electronic Journals Task Force >Princeton University Library >dgoodman@princeton.edu http://www.princeton.edu/~biolib/ >phone: 609-258-3235 fax: 609-258-2627 > >__________________________________________
- Prev by Date: RE: pricing questions: perspective from a publisher
- Next by Date: PubMed Central Update.
- Prev by thread: Congratulations to AAAS (and a few others)
- Next by thread: Re: Congratulations to AAAS (and a few others)
- Index(es):