[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Future of the "subscription model?"
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Future of the "subscription model?"
- From: Mark Kurtz <mkurtz@arl.org>
- Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 20:17:49 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Is it possible that the more interesting question is whether it ought to be, from a public-good perspective? That would require a new economic settlement for scholarly communications, of course. But history is full of new economic settlements--some more painful and some less, some more successful and some less. Mark Kurtz On Oct 24, 2011, at 6:08 PM, Ann Okerson wrote: > Liblicense-l Readers: What do you all imagine as the future of > the "subscription model" for purchasing academic library > collections? Is it alive and well and growing or is it on its > way out, supplanted by memberships, open access, and a growing > variety of other options for obtaining publications, particularly > electronic? > > Your thoughts are most welcomed. Ann Okerson >
- Prev by Date: Re: Re. Hathi Orphans?
- Next by Date: Re: Future of the "subscription model?"
- Previous by thread: Future of the "subscription model?"
- Next by thread: Re: Future of the "subscription model?"
- Index(es):