[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Open Access and Peer Review
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Open Access and Peer Review
- From: Bill Cohen <bcohen7719@aol.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 07:07:30 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Ken: Are you referring to the series of articles by Jeffrey Beall? I believe they focused on just a few OA publishers. Bill On 10/3/11 4:51 PM, Ken Masters wrote: > Hi Sabrina > > To answer your first question: whatever you find, don't expect it > to be uniform. Just as there is no set uniform standard of > peer-review for Non-OA publishers and journals, so there is no > set uniform standard of peer-review for OA publishers and > journals. > > There was an attempt some years back to consciously link OA with > non-peer-review in a move to discredit OA. I'm not entirely sure > how seriously it was taken, and how widely it was used, but it > did have some success: from my personal discussions with > academics, that image does persist, but there is nothing inherent > in the OA model that either encourages or discourages > peer-review: it's up to the publisher and journal. > > > Regards > > Ken > ------ > > Dr. Ken Masters > Asst. Professor: Medical Informatics > Medical Education Unit > College of Medicine& Health Sciences > Sultan Qaboos University > Sultanate of Oman > E-i-C: The Internet Journal of Medical Education
- Prev by Date: RE: Big Deal Survey
- Next by Date: Evaluating Publishers
- Previous by thread: Re: Open Access and Peer Review
- Next by thread: Re: Open Access and Peer Review
- Index(es):