[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: 8,000 authors favour Open Access and see impact
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: RE: 8,000 authors favour Open Access and see impact
- From: "Ken Masters" <kmasters@ithealthed.com>
- Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 09:23:26 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Hi All Although I'm in favour of Open Access, Sally's concern is spot-on. If not 'circular', then it certainly only gives one half of the story. The conclusion does briefly note that "The survey was conducted amongst a group of authors who are already favourably inclined towards Open Access." Given that only OA authors were polled, I think the title of the report is mis-leading. Perhaps, instead of "Author Attitudes Towards Open Access Publishing" it should be "Open Access Authors' Attitudes Towards Open Access Publishing" Regards Ken Dr. Ken Masters Asst. Professor: Medical Informatics Medical Education Unit College of Medicine & Health Sciences Sultan Qaboos University Sultanate of Oman E-i-C: The Internet Journal of Medical Education > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: RE: 8,000 authors favour Open Access and see impact > From: "Sally Morris" <sally@morris-assocs.demon.co.uk> > Date: Fri, May 20, 2011 6:41 am > To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu> > > Isn't this a bit circular, if only OA authors were surveyed? > > Sally Morris > South House, The Street, Clapham, Worthing, West Sussex, UK BN13 3UU > Email: sally@morris-assocs.demon.co.uk > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu > [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Jennie Johnson > Sent: 19 May 2011 02:47 > To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu > Subject: 8,000 authors favour Open Access and see impact > > Dear all, > > I thought you might be interested to learn that InTech, an Open > Access publisher, last week published a White Paper entitled > 'Author Attitudes towards Open Access Publishing' - making > available results from a recent survey of over 8,000 authors to > determine their attitudes towards Open Access. > > The benefits of the Open Access (OA) model continue to be debated > by publishers and librarians, but relatively little research has > been undertaken to understand the attitudes of researchers. It > was with this in mind that InTech commissioned TBI to survey its > 25,000-strong author-base to help better understand researcher > awareness of and attitudes towards this evolving model. By > sharing the results of this survey, InTech hopes to dispel some > of the myths about what researchers truly value relating to OA > and peer review. > > I've copied yesterday's press release below for your information, > or to read the White Paper and see for yourself the full results > of the survey, go to: > http://www.intechweb.org/public_files/Intech_OA_Apr11.pdf > > I do hope this is of interest; please let me know if you would > like any more information. > > All best wishes, > > Jennie Johnson, TBI Communications > > Tel: +44 1865 875896 > > [SNIP]
- Prev by Date: Re: Peer-Editors and Peer Review
- Next by Date: Presentation on reading on mobile devices
- Previous by thread: RE: 8,000 authors favour Open Access and see impact
- Next by thread: ALPSP - Licensing your Content, London July, 2011
- Index(es):