[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
SOAP Survey Delivers Slippery Results
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: SOAP Survey Delivers Slippery Results
- From: Philip Davis <pmd8@cornell.edu>
- Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 20:33:48 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
In today's Scholarly Kitchen, I critique the survey of scientists conducted by the Study of Open Access Publishing (SOAP) group. see: SOAP Survey Requires Clean Interpretation of Data: http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2011/02/02/soap-open-access-survey/ "Given the scores of individuals involved in creating, promoting and analyzing this survey, and the voluntary participation of 40,000 scientists, the researchers missed an great opportunity to contribute valid and generalizable details to a field that is woefully lacking of objective data. While one should not dismiss the SOAP survey out of hand, we should be critical of what it measures, what the data mean, and how we can conduct better surveys in the future."
- Prev by Date: print collection usage and aftermarketing (fwd)
- Next by Date: Re: Narrative Science
- Previous by thread: print collection usage and aftermarketing (fwd)
- Next by thread: February 2011 issue of the SPARC Open Access Newsletter
- Index(es):