[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Selling researchers their own work?
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Selling researchers their own work?
- From: Sandy Thatcher <sgt3@psu.edu>
- Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:15:36 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Huh? What's new about publishers asking authors to pay for collections that include their own work and that of their colleagues? Hasn't that been going on for centuries, in traditional anthologies? What I find potentially exciting, under this rubric, is the kind of scheme just announced on this list by HighWire Press and Sheridan Custom Publishing Direct, whereby any customer could order just a group of articles that would match his or her particular needs. This would presumably meet the demand from individuals like Joe who are not affiliated with any university. Sandy Thatcher >"Library bypass", as brought up recently by Joe Esposito, applied >to scholarly publishing has interesting implications. I can't >wait to see what authors think when publishers ask them to pay >for collections that include their own work, and that of their >colleagues! > >This strategy would also (quite accidentally, I suspect) be great >marketing for library services. :) > >Heather Morrison, MLIS >The Imaginary Journal of Poetic Economics >http://poeticeconomics.blogspot.com
- Prev by Date: Critique of OA metric
- Next by Date: Re: Growth for STM publishers in 2008
- Previous by thread: Selling researchers their own work?
- Next by thread: Re: Selling researchers their own work?
- Index(es):