[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Peer review 2.0
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Peer review 2.0
- From: "Tony McSean" <tmcsean@hollar.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 23:02:20 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Aside from the recent discussions on peer review, one of the perennial themes on this list is the possibility that blog-style community review of new writing might be a viable, and cheaper, alternative to the traditional sort. This link from today's Guardian Technology supplement: http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/jun/17/seth-finkelstein-read-me-first Gives an interesting trace of how the ludicrous story concerning a USB-powered portable microwave has spread throughout traditional and online media. It will surprise no UK liblicense reader that it seemed to start with an article in our own Daily Mail, but has spread widely without having been checked by countless posted reality-check comments. Finkelstein comments that it seems to have been driven by a journalistic compulsion to tell a good story regardless of truth, and the lack of incentive to publish corrections in the new media. Clearly these factors apply far, far less in liblicense-land. But it's an interesting slant on a real-life blog review, and a I can certainly attest to a natural unwillingness to slide down through a comment column in the hope that Comment 94 might contain something more interesting than 'I can't wait to buy one of these so I can heat my coffee on the motorway while catching up with my SMSs'. Tony Tony McSean WHO Global Health Library +41 22 791 3539
- Prev by Date: Re: Hoax Article Accepted by OA Bentham Journal
- Next by Date: improving the quality of peer review
- Previous by thread: Building collections at all (Re: Building collections in a bad economy)
- Next by thread: improving the quality of peer review
- Index(es):