[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Building collections at all (Re: Building collections in a bad economy)
- To: "liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Building collections at all (Re: Building collections in a bad economy)
- From: Rick Anderson <rick.anderson@utah.edu>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:35:07 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
> collection-building in these very difficult times and have been > struck by the fact that there is little discussion of testing > on-demand services. Joe, there is a actually quite a lot of discussion going on in the library world around this issue, and experiments are in fact being conducted. Greg and Scott have both alluded to some of them. At my institution we're in the second phase of a fairly large-scale experiment with on-demand ebook purchasing using a system whereby many ebook records are loaded into our catalog and only those that are actually used by patrons get purchased and added to our permanent collection -- records for the unused titles eventually disappear. A good number of other research libraries are conducting similar tests. We're also looking very seriously at purchasing an Espresso Book Machine, which would allow us to print and bind books on demand -- selling them to patrons where ownership is desired, and adding them to our collections (with exceptions) where it isn't. (Given our relatively poor track record at guessing what people will want, demonstrated patron interest in a particular title seems like as good a collecting criterion as any.) Here's the really radical question, though: why are most of us building permanent collections at all anymore? As Greg pointed out, in very many cases we can now respond to patrons' expressed needs quickly enough that buying speculatively seems like a poor use of money -- especially in the current budget environment. It's already kind of silly for patrons to use our catalogs as discovery tools, since any library's collection represents only a tiny fraction of the material that is actually available on any given topic. Since our patrons tend now to be searching through a much larger segment of the information universe than we could ever hope to collect ahead of time, why don't we focus on fast fulfillment rather than wasting money on stuff no one wants? Rick Anderson Assoc. Dir. For Scholarly Resources & Collections Marriott Library Univ. of Utah rick.anderson@utah.edu
- Prev by Date: RE: Building collections in a bad economy
- Next by Date: Re: Hoax Article Accepted by OA Bentham Journal
- Previous by thread: Article on arXiv
- Next by thread: Peer review 2.0
- Index(es):