[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hoax Article Accepted by OA Bentham Journal
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Hoax Article Accepted by OA Bentham Journal
- From: Greg Tananbaum <gtananbaum@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 22:47:41 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
So to rehash where we are on the listserv, peer review is either essential or useless, open access is either scholarly communication's savior or an informational form of snake oil, libraries are either hamstrung by the current economic crisis or using it as an opportunity to experiment with new forms of collection development, and the annual subscription model that is the norm in the space is either ripe for a challenge or solid as a rock. I'll pull the bus up and we can drive up to Capitol Hill to tackle health care, the economy and peace in the middle east. (Sorry attempts at) joking aside, kudos to the list. These are important issues, and, while we may sometimes stray into the type of grandiose overstatement that characterize talk radio, by and large each topic is being contemplated with insight and intelligence. I look forward to continued rigorous debate. Best, Greg -- Greg Tananbaum Consulting Services at the Intersection of Technology, Content, & Academia (510) 295-7504 greg@scholarnext.com http://www.scholarnext.com
- Prev by Date: Building collections at all (Re: Building collections in a bad economy)
- Next by Date: Re: Hoax Article Accepted by OA Bentham Journal
- Previous by thread: Re: Hoax Article Accepted by OA Bentham Journal
- Next by thread: Re: Hoax Article Accepted by OA Bentham Journal
- Index(es):