[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: selling e-articles
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu, "B.G. Sloan" <bgsloan2@yahoo.com>
- Subject: Re: selling e-articles
- From: "Barbara Fister" <fister@gac.edu>
- Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 17:33:55 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Yes - the National Geographic case involved photography. Tasini found in favor of the authors, though there's still some fallout litigation going on; National Geographic was found in favor of the NGS, because unlike Tasini it didn't disaggregate the photos but reproduced the whole shebang on a CD. http://www.nppa.org/news_and_events/news/2008/07/greenberg.html Though everything has been simplified: Wal-Mart has recently ruled that "copyright is forever" - :o) http://www.boingboing.net/2008/08/12/walmart-you-cant-sca.html Barbara Fister Quoting "B.G. Sloan" <bgsloan2@yahoo.com>: > Pippa Smart said: > > "The problem that your colleague was thinking of is Tasini, a > case where the NYT took photographs that it had used in one > publication, and then created a new database product without the > permission of the photographers - the problem was the creation of > a new product." > > Didn't the Tasini case involve freelance writers who claimed that > publishers had violated their copyrights by placing their works > in third party electronic databases without obtaining permission > from the freelance writers? > > Bernie Sloan > Sora Associates > Bloomington, IN
- Prev by Date: RE: question regarding OA
- Next by Date: RE: selling e-articles
- Previous by thread: Re: selling e-articles
- Next by thread: RE: selling e-articles
- Index(es):