[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: question regarding OA
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: question regarding OA
- From: "Sally Morris \(Morris Associates\)" <sally@morris-assocs.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 18:29:12 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I think the problem for publishers would be that the red/green/gold classification is very broad-brush - publishers' actual policies are much more nuanced than that. It's also not clear to me how much it actually matters to authors in making publication choices - recent research suggests that few of them greatly care. Perhaps list members could tell us whether it does affect librarians' acquisition decisions? Sally Morris Consultant, Morris Associates (Publishing Consultancy) South House, The Street Clapham, Worthing, West Sussex BN13 3UU, UK Email: sally@morris-assocs.demon.co.uk -----Original Message----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Maryanne Kennan Sent: 14 August 2008 02:28 To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: Re: question regarding OA G'day, I would think so, but possibly only for those publishers with "liberal" policies. It would be a plus for authors who are aware of OA issues, and save them time in scrutinising publishing agreements, searching SHERPA/RoMEO etc, and would be no skin of the nose for authors who are not yet interested... and it might save publishers time in answering queries... It would also help readers, but this may not interest publishers as much...???? Cheers Mary Anne -- PhD Candidate Information Systems, Technology and Management Australian School of Business The University of New South Wales NSW 2052 AUSTRALIA Email: maryanne.kennan@unsw.edu.au -----owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu wrote: ----- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu From: "Greg Tananbaum" <gtananbaum@gmail.com> Sent by: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Date: 13/08/2008 10:08AM Subject: question regarding OA "color status" as a marketing tool Hello List Members, I am working with a journal publisher on a project that touches on copyright and open access archiving policies. One item that has come up concerns the extent to which publishers publicize their OA "standing" (i.e., Green, Blue, etc.). Is this a selling point that content providers feel is worth trumpeting, particularly those who may combine liberal pre- and post-print rights with a subscription model? Do they put in on their websites, in marketing collateral, and so forth? Any insights list members can provide, either to the forum or offline, would be most appreciated. Greg Tananbaum Consulting Services at the Intersection of Technology, Content, & Academia gtananbaum@gmail.com http://www.scholarnext.com
- Prev by Date: Re: Multiple authors on OA articles in IR's
- Next by Date: Re: selling e-articles
- Previous by thread: Re: question regarding OA
- Next by thread: Taylor & Francis Group and PubMed Central
- Index(es):