[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE : second-hand ownership
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE : second-hand ownership
- From: <jean.claude.guedon@umontreal.ca>
- Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 17:34:32 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
There is another take on all of this. The handwritten text is in the public domain, becquse of its age. However, the text is unique since it is a unique manuscript. By allowing a copy, the library actually offers to separate the text from the paper to put it on some other piece of paper. But its sole claim to prtoperty is on the paper, not the text. Only by controlling access to the paper can the library exact a fee for copying. But once it is copied, the new piece of paper does not belong to them unless they specified by contract that they only lease the paper). Ergo, it would seem you can do whatever you want with the library. This said, it would be courteous to check with them and then decide what to do depending on their response. I am no lawyer but had some similar discussions once with people trying to publish some manuscripts whose content was in the public domain because of its age. Jean-Claude Guedon
- Prev by Date: RE: second-hand ownership
- Next by Date: RE: second-hand ownership
- Previous by thread: Springer deal with Portico -- the fine print
- Next by thread: Re: citations as indicators of quality
- Index(es):