[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Springer deal with Portico -- the fine print
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Springer deal with Portico -- the fine print
- From: Jim Stemper <stemp003@tc.umn.edu>
- Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 20:10:26 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
[This message is being cross-posted; apologies for duplication] Since U-Minnesota is a Portico participant library, I was happy to see the "Springer titles to be preserved by Portico" press release here until I noticed what wasn't stated -- that participating libraries cannot obtain access via Portico should they be forced to cancel a Springer title. http://www.portico.org/news/103007.html My *guess* (just a hunch) is that Springer doesn't want to endanger their "negotiated fee per title per year for ongoing online access." http://www.springer.com/west/home/librarians?SGWID=4-117-7-403810-0&teaserId=68602&CENTER_ID=173614#anchor6 I have to give credit to Elsevier, Taylor and Francis, and Wiley for allowing such access where Springer won't. And I wish the Portico announcements were more up front about this fine print, so that participating libraries know what they are getting (and not getting) for their membership fees. With so many of us going e-only for targeted publishers, this is less and less a theoretical issue. If you cancel a Springer title, it will cost more money (beyond what you may already be paying Portico) to keep those SFX buttons finding full text of older articles to which you once subscribed. Clearly there is still a need, even with the Portico service, to continue requesting perpetual access rights in e-journal negotiations. _________________________________________________________ Jim Stemper stemp003@tc.umn.edu University of Minnesota Libraries Phone:(612) 624-7082 309-19th Ave.So. Fax:(612) 625-3428 Minneapolis, MN 55455 http://www.lib.umn.edu
- Prev by Date: Publishing Management Consultant: "Open Access Is Research Spam"
- Next by Date: RE: second-hand ownership
- Previous by thread: Publishing Management Consultant: "Open Access Is Research Spam"
- Next by thread: RE : second-hand ownership
- Index(es):