[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: NIH Public Access Mandate Passes Senate
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: NIH Public Access Mandate Passes Senate
- From: "T Scott Plutchak" <tscott@uab.edu>
- Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 19:11:14 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
The deposit would be of the "author's final manuscript" of a paper that has been accepted for publication. In essence, this language authorizes NIH to make the current voluntary policy a mandatory one. Details of the current policy are here: http://publicaccess.nih.gov/. In general, "author's final manuscript" is understood to be the author's version of the paper that has been accepted, with all of the corrections/changes necessitated by peer review, but not necessarily with any copy-editing changes. As to the liklihood of the president signing this bill (Rick's question), my guess (and it's all just a matter of guessing at the moment) is that the odds right now are slim. We'll see if the conference committee can put together a bill that satisfies the White House, but I'm not particularly optimistic. (There's also a slim chance that the NIH provision could be yanked out during conference, although that appears to be pretty unlikely). Scott T. Scott Plutchak Director, Lister Hill Library of the Health Sciences University of Alabama at Birmingham tscott@uab.edu -----Original Message----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Ann Okerson Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 9:11 PM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: RE: NIH Public Access Mandate Passes Senate I hope this question isn't too naive -- but is the requirement that (1) authors should submit reports of their NIH-funded research to PMC and these can be in a form of their choosing, such as working reports for their or others' Web sites; OR that (2) authors should submit reports of their NIH-funded research to PMC and these must be in the form of articles that are heading for publication in a medical journal; OR THAT (3) these reports must be copies of articles that have been published in peer reviewed journals? Do authors have flexiblity in what can be submitted? Thank you, Ann Okerson/Yale Library
- Prev by Date: Re: Publishing trade associations on rules for Orphan Works
- Next by Date: RE: NIH Public Access Mandate Passes Senate
- Previous by thread: RE: NIH Public Access Mandate Passes Senate
- Next by thread: RE: NIH Public Access Mandate Passes Senate
- Index(es):