[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: NIH Public Access Mandate Passes Senate
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: RE: NIH Public Access Mandate Passes Senate
- From: Kevin L Smith <kevin.l.smith@duke.edu>
- Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 19:09:23 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
The language of the section in the appropriations bill is that investigators must submit to PubMed Central "an electronic version of their final, peer-reviewed manuscript upon acceptance for publication." So I think it is closest to option 2 below -- it is to be the final version as published, which is not quite the same thing as a copy of the published article, but it should be the identical content. As for the likelihood of a veto, I have seen an administration report on the whole appropriations bill that disapproves of the section 217 provision, saying that the voluntary system should be given more time to work and that NIH and publishers should continue private negotiations, but I think the veto threat is over the much larger issue of the level of spending. Personally, I doubt the President would veto an otherwise acceptable bill because of this provision. It remains to be seen if he will veto the bill on grounds similar to the SCHIP veto, with the prospect of defunding whole government agencies beginning to loom. Kevin L. Smith, J.D. Scholarly Communications Officer Perkins Library, Duke University PO Box 90193 Durham, NC 27708 919-668-4451 kevin.l.smith@duke.edu http://library.duke.edu/blogs/scholcomm/ *************** "Ann Okerson" <aokerson@gmail.com> Sent by: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu 10/25/2007 10:10 PM Subject RE: NIH Public Access Mandate Passes Senate I hope this question isn't too naive -- but is the requirement that (1) authors should submit reports of their NIH-funded research to PMC and these can be in a form of their choosing, such as working reports for their or others' Web sites; OR that (2) authors should submit reports of their NIH-funded research to PMC and these must be in the form of articles that are heading for publication in a medical journal; OR THAT (3) these reports must be copies of articles that have been published in peer reviewed journals? Do authors have flexiblity in what can be submitted? Thank you, Ann Okerson/Yale Library
- Prev by Date: RE: NIH Public Access Mandate Passes Senate
- Next by Date: RE: NIH Public Access Mandate Passes Senate
- Previous by thread: RE: NIH Public Access Mandate Passes Senate
- Next by thread: RE: NIH Public Access Mandate Passes Senate
- Index(es):