[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: NIH Public Access Mandate Passes Senate



My understanding from ALA (I'm a legislative advocate for ACRL 
and also the legnet rep for California) is that if the bill is 
vetoed, it won't be related to the NIH issue, but to other 
issues.

Aline Soules
Cal State East Bay
510-885-4596
aline.soules@csueastbay.edu

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu on behalf of Rick Anderson
Sent: Thu 10/25/2007 6:48 PM
To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Subject: RE: NIH Public Access Mandate Passes Senate

This is certainly good news and I don't want to throw a wet
blanket on things -- but how likely is it that President Bush
would sign this bill into law, assuming it gets through both
houses with the requirement language intact?

---
Rick Anderson
Assoc. Dir. for Scholarly Resources & Collections
Marriott Library
University of Utah
rick.anderson@utah.edu