[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: NIH Public Access Mandate Passes Senate
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu, liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: RE: NIH Public Access Mandate Passes Senate
- From: Aline Soules <aline.soules@csueastbay.edu>
- Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 18:54:32 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
My understanding from ALA (I'm a legislative advocate for ACRL and also the legnet rep for California) is that if the bill is vetoed, it won't be related to the NIH issue, but to other issues. Aline Soules Cal State East Bay 510-885-4596 aline.soules@csueastbay.edu -----Original Message----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu on behalf of Rick Anderson Sent: Thu 10/25/2007 6:48 PM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: RE: NIH Public Access Mandate Passes Senate This is certainly good news and I don't want to throw a wet blanket on things -- but how likely is it that President Bush would sign this bill into law, assuming it gets through both houses with the requirement language intact? --- Rick Anderson Assoc. Dir. for Scholarly Resources & Collections Marriott Library University of Utah rick.anderson@utah.edu
- Prev by Date: RE: NIH Public Access Mandate Passes Senate
- Next by Date: Re: Publishing trade associations on rules for Orphan Works
- Previous by thread: RE: NIH Public Access Mandate Passes Senate
- Next by thread: RE: NIH Public Access Mandate Passes Senate
- Index(es):