[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Clarification on SERU proposal
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Clarification on SERU proposal
- From: "Judy Luther" <judy.luther@informedstrategies.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 18:22:23 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Buddy, While that sounds like an easy approach, there is a significant difference between SERU as a common understanding jointly developed by librarians and publishers and a click-through agreement that is considered one-sided. Some libraries must treat click-throughs as a standard agreement which means they must still handle legal documents. To avoid confusion we distinguish SERU as a "common understanding" rather than "terms and conditions" or an "agreement" which have a legal connotation. We suggest that publishers reference SERU and prefer that they link to it. Judy Luther MLS, MBA www.InformedStrategies.com 610-645-7546 EDT _____ *To: < <mailto:liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu> *Subject: RE: Clarification on SERU proposal *From: "Pennington, Buddy D." < <mailto:penningtonb@umkc.edu> *Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 18:33:31 EDT Wouldn't it be possible for publishers who agree with the SERU terms and conditions to simply use that for their click-through agreements? Buddy Pennington Serial Acquisitions Librarian University of Missouri - Kansas City University Libraries www.umkc.edu/lib
- Prev by Date: Clarification on SERU proposal
- Next by Date: Clarification on SERU proposal
- Previous by thread: Clarification on SERU proposal
- Next by thread: Clarification on SERU proposal
- Index(es):