[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Clarification on SERU proposal
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Clarification on SERU proposal
- From: "Judy Luther" <judy.luther@informedstrategies.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 18:13:13 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Hi Sandy, I think you are right about the University of Chicago's approach being a "click through license" or a license of adhesion. Since many libraries must print them and treat them as if they were license agreements, you don't necessarily see savings in the time required for the process. In fact, it can be harder to initiate needed license negotiations. The SERU approach is different in an important way - it's not another kind of license, even a click-through license. SERU is an optional approach and avoids the use of "terms and conditions", "agreements" or even "guidelines". With the SERU approach, publishers and subscribing institutions may choose to forgo the license - even a license of adhesion. The only terms of the exchange are thus the business terms: what, for how much, for how long. SERU describes a general understanding of behavior and can be an option for those publishers for whom the paperwork isn't worth the handling cost. I'm going to post a response to John Cox's message shortly and I think you might find his description of this approach as an implied contract without a license helpful. The power of this kind of approach is that for many transactions, both parties may be satisfied without the expensive and time-consuming resort of a license agreement. Judy Luther MLS, MBA Informed Strategies LLC 610-645-7546 EDT judy.luther@informedstrategies.com <outbind://200/www.informedstrategies.com> www.informedstrategies.com _____ But doesn't this "agreement," whether it takes the form of a "written license" or not, still come with "terms and conditions," which is what the recent post from the University of Chicago Press mentioned. And if one must accept these "terms and conditions" through some sort of click-on procedure, isn't that still a "license" fully valid in a court of law? Our officials at Penn State frown on such click-on agreements, and we at the Press have had to negotiate individually a number of them anyway with the vendors offering them. Sandy Thatcher Penn State University Press
- Prev by Date: Clarification on SERU proposal
- Next by Date: Clarification on SERU proposal
- Previous by thread: Clarification on SERU proposal
- Next by thread: Clarification on SERU proposal
- Index(es):