[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Central site for IR
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Central site for IR
- From: "Joseph Esposito" <espositoj@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 18:55:55 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
No quarrel with the distributed repository idea, but let's not put all the search eggs in Google's basket. Google is wonderful for what it is wonderful at, but it is not nearly as good for professional and scientific information. Google is a keyword search engine with an outstanding method for ranking results (PageRank). PageRank analyzes links between sites. This is great when there ARE links, but academic papers can be both relevant and important without any links whatsoever. Google can't help much here (though it will find the key words). It's easy to forget that Google is all of 8 years old. With the amount of research going into search now, Google may have disappeared from our memories before it turns 16. Joe Esposito On 7/31/06, Martin Frank <MFrank@the-aps.org> wrote: > > Why do we need it? That is the argument against a central PMC > repository. With the search technology that exists today, a > central repository is unnecessary. Let Google Scholar crawl > journal sites as it already does to provide access to the > literature, or invite NIH to extend PubMed/Medline backward with > links in parallel with the journal legacy projects that are being > undertaken, so the public and scientific community can readily > find what they are looking. Central is unnecessary, duplicative > of distributed journal and institutional repository sites, and a > diversion of research dollars unnecessarily. > > Martin Frank, Ph.D. > Executive Director, American Physiological Society > email: mfrank@the-aps.org > > ________________________________ > > From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu on behalf of Richard Feinman > Sent: Fri 7/28/2006 7:27 PM > To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu > Subject: Central site for IR > > Wouldn't it be good to have a central site for IR supported by > grants or all the institutions that wanted to use it as a > repository? > > Richard D. Feinman, Co-editor-in-chief > Nutrition & Metabolism ( http://www.nutritionandmetabolism.com /home )
- Prev by Date: New Criminal Law Review joins University of California Press
- Next by Date: Re: Provosts' letter in support of FRPAA
- Previous by thread: Re: Central site for IR
- Next by thread: UCI researchers 'text mine' the New York Times, demonstrating evolution of potent new technology
- Index(es):