[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Print-Only Subscription Trend
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Print-Only Subscription Trend
- From: Neil Renison <neil.renison@jcu.edu.au>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 21:15:24 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Hello Kim,
Factors might include:
* Inertia
* Price differential between Duke print or online is small, so no cost
incentive for e-only option
* Price differential for Duke print plus online is significant , so a
cost disincentive applies
* License issues for multi-campus institutions. I know from experience
that Duke University Press can be very reasonable about this,
but it may deter subscribers or be a factor that agents don't
want to (or can't) deal with. It's another matter to deal with
anyway.
* Print copy may be perceived as more secure for long term preservation
and access.
* Humanities and Social Sciences seem less ready to take up e-only and
less dependent on immediate access to new research.
I could only make a guess as to which of the above have greater impact. It may be just the least justifiable reason, inertia.
*******************************************************
Neil Renison - Librarian (Acquisitions Services)
Information Resources
James Cook University
Townsville QLD 4811 Australia.
Email: Neil.Renison@jcu.edu.au
Phone: (07) 4781 5073 Fax: (07) 4781 5886
*******************************************************
- Prev by Date: RE: Blackwell Announces High Growth in Impact Factor
- Next by Date: RE: Print-Only Subscription Trend
- Previous by thread: RE: Print-Only Subscription Trend
- Next by thread: RE: Print-Only Subscription Trend
- Index(es):