[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Print-Only Subscription Trend
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>, <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Print-Only Subscription Trend
- From: "David Goodman" <David.Goodman@liu.edu>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 21:29:53 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Dear Kim, I assume you are talking about only institutional subscriptions. Many Duke UP titles would be expected to have a significant number of individual copies. If I were a constant reader of one of your titles, I might want a print-only copy to supplement my library's e-only, or even e+print. If it is only institutional, then I would be interested to know what the proportions are by size/type of library and by geographic region. The only explanations I can give is that it is done either: 1/in very small colleges 2/ by librarians that are totally dominated by faculty who do not know what they are doing 3/ in more tradition-bound countries 4/ humanities are peculiar. . This would be a occasion for some of those publishers on this list who generally do not post to share their unique knowledge--anonymously if necessary Dr. David Goodman Associate Professor Palmer School of Library and Information Science Long Island University dgoodman@liu.edu dgoodman@princeton.edu
- Prev by Date: Re: Print-Only Subscription Trend
- Next by Date: RE: Print-Only Subscription Trend
- Previous by thread: Re: Print-Only Subscription Trend
- Next by thread: RE: Print-Only Subscription Trend
- Index(es):