[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Take that for a yes.
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Take that for a yes.
- From: "Rick Anderson" <rickand@unr.edu>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 20:57:02 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
> I said I would give you all the money you need. Now money is > taken care > of. Is OA a good idea? My $.02 on this question: Sure, it's a great idea -- as long as the unlimited funding for OA isn't being siphoned away from something that's an even better idea than OA. In the real world, any funding model will involve opportunity costs that need to be taken into consideration. So given a choice between, say, universal OA and universal health care, the better choice is obviously not OA. (The vast majority of people would clearly benefit much more from universal access to doctors than from universal access to medical journal articles.) ---- Rick Anderson Dir. of Resource Acquisition University of Nevada, Reno Libraries (775) 784-6500 x273 rickand@unr.edu
- Prev by Date: Access to the Archives of Two ECS Journals Now Available
- Next by Date: Take it all for a yes, and on to Q.2a.
- Previous by thread: RE: Take that for a yes.
- Next by thread: Re: Dramatic Growth of Open Access
- Index(es):