[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PLoS Financial Analysis
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: PLoS Financial Analysis
- From: "Anthony Watkinson" <anthony.watkinson@btopenworld.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 00:21:11 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I feel an urge coming over me to defend an OA project which I shall not resist. All "traditional" journal publishers know very well that launching new journals, especially new journals with different models, is very difficult. I suspect and to some extent I know that projections are almost always over-optimistic. One is almost always running several years behind projections. What is important is to adjust to circumstances and that is exactly what PLOS is doing. They are honest about it. I would suggest that if the trend in the finances is going in the right direction there is a sustainable model here even if PLOS are not yet where they predicted that they would be. Anthony Watkinson ----- Original Message ----- From: "William Walters" <William.Walters@millersville.edu> To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu> Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 2:17 AM Subject: PLoS Financial Analysis > See http://www.nature.com/news/2006/060619/full/441914a.html for > news of financial difficulties at PLoS and for more detailed > information about their revenue sources than I've seen anywhere > else. > > Bill > > William H. Walters, PhD > Assistant Professor of Librarianship > Collection Development Librarian > Helen A. Ganser Library > Millersville University > Millersville, PA 17551-0302 >
- Prev by Date: RE: Q 1. on OA
- Next by Date: Re: Take that for a yes.
- Previous by thread: PLoS Financial Analysis
- Next by thread: Re: PLoS Financial Analysis
- Index(es):