[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Take that for a yes.
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
 - Subject: Re: Take that for a yes.
 - From: Phil Davis <pmd8@cornell.edu>
 - Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 00:38:58 EDT
 - Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
 - Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
 
Richard D. Feinman wrote:
I said I would give you all the money you need. Now money is taken care of. Is OA a good idea? I will take your answer as a yes.
In such a thought-experiment, unlimited financial resources for publication would also lead to unlimited prices charged to authors, as there would be no incentive for publishers to contain costs and market prices approach infinity. [1] If taxpayers want accountability for the funds that flow into research, such a world of unlimited resources may not be the one you chose to live in. While not ideal, this may be "the best of all possible worlds" (Leibniz) [1] Argument based on Reductio ad absurdum, or proof by contraction. see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum Phil Davis
- Prev by Date: Re: PLoS Financial Analysis
 - Next by Date: =?GB2312?B?QUQ60MKy+sa3uea7rtPrv827p9Dox/O31s72?=
 - Previous by thread: RE: Take that for a yes.
 - Next by thread: RE: Take that for a yes.
 - Index(es):
 
