[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Fish or fowl?
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Fish or fowl?
- From: "Sloan, Bernie" <bernies@uillinois.edu>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 19:42:52 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
And, as the publishers ask, what is a snippet? -----Original Message----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Joseph Esposito Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 5:44 PM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: Fish or fowl? Concerning Google Print, whether or not one finds the service to be satisfactory may depend on what metaphor one brings to it. Is Google Print supposed to be a library? If so, it is a highly unsatisfactory one, as snippets of text are hardly a substitute for an entire book. But it was not as a library that Google sought the participation of publishers. For publishers GP was postioned as a form of bookstore. Google would find the books, display the snippets, and encourage the purchase of the books. >From what publishers tell me, it is working. To put the point more emphatically, if anyone finds GP to be satisfactory as a library, then Google could be accused of misleading publishers. -- Joe Esposito
- Prev by Date: Open Access Self-archiving - an author study: Final Report (fwd)
- Next by Date: Routledge Focus Group Breakfasts at ALA
- Previous by thread: Fish or fowl?
- Next by thread: Re: Fish or fowl?
- Index(es):