[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fish or fowl?
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Fish or fowl?
- From: Joseph Esposito <espositoj@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 20:54:52 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Yes, what is a snippet? But there is another aspect of the Google Print program that gives publishers pause, the requirement that they allow up to 20% of the text to be accessible online. Of course, 20% is not 100%, but it is a far cry from the 500 words that most publishers agree constitutes acceptable fair use. Google is pushing the envelope, no question about it. Joe Esposito On 6/10/05, Sloan, Bernie <bernies@uillinois.edu> wrote: > And, as the publishers ask, what is a snippet? > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu > Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 5:44 PM > To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu > Subject: Fish or fowl? > > Concerning Google Print, whether or not one finds the service to be > satisfactory may depend on what metaphor one brings to it. Is Google > Print supposed to be a library? If so, it is a highly unsatisfactory one, > as snippets of text are hardly a substitute for an entire book. But it > was not as a library that Google sought the participation of publishers. > > For publishers GP was postioned as a form of bookstore. Google would find > the books, display the snippets, and encourage the purchase of the books. > >From what publishers tell me, it is working. To put the point more > emphatically, if anyone finds GP to be satisfactory as a library, then > Google could be accused of misleading publishers. > > -- > Joe Esposito
- Prev by Date: Newly Enhanced Registry of Open Access Repositories (ROAR)
- Next by Date: Interview with OSI's Melissa Hagemann
- Previous by thread: RE: Fish or fowl?
- Next by thread: Re: Fish or fowl?
- Index(es):