[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Fish or fowl?
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Fish or fowl?
- From: Joseph Esposito <espositoj@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 18:43:33 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Concerning Google Print, whether or not one finds the service to be satisfactory may depend on what metaphor one brings to it. Is Google Print supposed to be a library? If so, it is a highly unsatisfactory one, as snippets of text are hardly a substitute for an entire book. But it was not as a library that Google sought the participation of publishers. For publishers GP was postioned as a form of bookstore. Google would find the books, display the snippets, and encourage the purchase of the books. >From what publishers tell me, it is working. To put the point more emphatically, if anyone finds GP to be satisfactory as a library, then Google could be accused of misleading publishers. -- Joe Esposito
- Prev by Date: RE: Google Print Home Page now offers searching
- Next by Date: Re: Question about Google Print
- Previous by thread: Scholarly Communications Events at ALA Annual
- Next by thread: RE: Fish or fowl?
- Index(es):