[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Authors and OA (RE: Mandating OA around the corner)
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: RE: Authors and OA (RE: Mandating OA around the corner)
- From: Stevan Harnad <harnad@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 19:58:04 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Please don't confuse the institutional self-archiving of peer-reviewed journal articles -- BOAI-1 (green), done for the sake of providing OA to the 95% of articles published in the non-OA journals -- with the creation of alternative OA journals (BOAI-2, gold). This same point has been discussed many, many times in the American Scientist Open Access Forum since 1998... Stevan Harnad On Sat, 17 Jul 2004, Rick Anderson wrote: > Brian's suggestion is absolutely possible, and in fact, I think it makes > much more sense in an online environment than the current arrangement, in > which most of the worst aspects of traditional journal publishing are > simply being replicated in an online format. > > Of course, these bodies would be publishers, and would face all of the > costs that publishers face now (except for those associated with the > transition from print to online). Those costs would have to be recouped > somehow. There would also, inevitably, arise the problem of competing > credentialling bodies. > > None of this is to say that this kind of solution can't work -- I think > it can. But it will be difficult to get it going, and it will not > maintain itself automatically. > > --- > Rick Anderson > rickand@unr.edu
- Prev by Date: Re: Overlay journals redux
- Next by Date: RE: E-Journal overlays (was: Authors and OA)
- Previous by thread: Re: Authors and OA (RE: Mandating OA around the corner)
- Next by thread: Re: Authors and OA (RE: Mandating OA around the corner)
- Index(es):