[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Authors and OA (RE: Mandating OA around the corner)
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: Authors and OA (RE: Mandating OA around the corner)
- From: "Fytton Rowland" <J.F.Rowland@lboro.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 20:10:29 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Two points. First, the use of the term "Harnardian OA" is inappropriate. Stevan Harnad has always emphasised the need for proper refereed journals to continue, while their output ("postprints") is archived by authors for access free of charge, so there is no conflict between his position and authors' desire to be published in high-quality journals. Some of us may doubt whether that model could survive economically in the long term, but let's not misrepresent Stevan's position. Second, all of the practical difficulties for authors that Rick mentions are fully recognised by those who are advocating instituional repositories, and they are being addressed in detail in various current projects. One of these has just been completed for JISC, by a group co-ordinated by me, and I am also preparing an article for Serials Review about it (presumably for the same special issue)! It is acknowledged that populating the repositories is a key problem, which will only be solved by making it very easy for authors to submit their papers to them. That will be each individual university's job, though in the case of the UK, JISC may be able to smooth the way. Fytton Rowland, Loughborough University, UK. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rick Anderson" <rickand@unr.edu> Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 10:36 PM Subject: Authors and OA (RE: Mandating OA around the corner) >> The real problem with Harnadian OA (author self-archiving, for example) >> is that it doesn't work *for authors.* This is the key point. It is >> authors who have a huge stake in the status quo, as the journals they >> publish in are the means of determining professional advancement. > > Joe raises an essential issue here. For what it's worth, I'm working on a > piece right now for Serials Review that discusses this point -- that it's > one thing to come up with an OA model that pleases publishers, librarians > and the general public, and quite another to come up with a model that > will actually attract authors. [snip] > Rick Anderson > Univ. of Nevada, Reno Libraries
- Prev by Date: RE: E-Journal overlays (was: Authors and OA)
- Next by Date: SwetsWise Online Content welcomes new 2004 publishers
- Previous by thread: RE: Authors and OA (RE: Mandating OA around the corner)
- Next by thread: Rockefeller University Press Announces Tiered Pricing for 2005
- Index(es):