[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Different kinds of Open Access
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: Different kinds of Open Access
- From: "Fytton Rowland" <J.F.Rowland@lboro.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 19:28:27 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
"Now, when do we *really* break away from the hardcopy mindset and get rid of the idea that authors must be cited? That's the bugaboo that stands in the way of community-based content creation. Joe Esposito" I don't think we can. Formally or informally, people's livelihoods depend on their being able to demonstrate what they can do, what they have achieved and what they might therefore be able to do in the future. That means that they will need to be able to demonstrate that a piece of creative work is *theirs*. It seems to me that there will always be a place for two separate kinds of scholarly communication (regardless of medium, and regardless of how the system is paid for): (a) discussion, debate and collaboration; and (b) putting quality-controlled work on to permanent record. Active researchers will contribute to both, but the latter will continue to be used to measure the worth of any one individual's contribution. Fytton Rowland, Loughborough University, UK
- Prev by Date: RE: Libraries in Springer Open Choice (a response from Peter Hendriks)
- Next by Date: Re: Different kinds of Open Access
- Previous by thread: Different kinds of Open Access
- Next by thread: Re: Different kinds of Open Access
- Index(es):