[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Different kinds of Open Access
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: Different kinds of Open Access
- From: "Sally Morris \(ALPSP\)" <chief-exec@alpsp.org>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 19:35:36 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Open Access isn't religion! There isn't any particular 'right way'; the various sets of 'principles beginning with B' don't have any objective standing... Sally Morris, Chief Executive Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers E-mail: chief-exec@alpsp.org ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joseph J. Esposito" <espositoj@worldnet.att.net> To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu> Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 1:15 AM Subject: Different kinds of Open Access > >The question I'm trying to answer for myself is whether publishing under > >the OA model _does_ mean that an author must abdicate her copyright by, > >in essence, transferring it to the whole world. I didn't think so, but > >the Bethesda Principles do make such a renunciation explicit; an author > >who publishes according to those principles retains none of the exclusive > >rights that are integral to the concept of copyright. (And make no > >mistake, it is the exclusiveness of those rights, not just the rights > >themselves, that makes copyright what it is. If everyone in the world > >has the right to copy and distribute my work, then to say that I retain > >copyright in that work is meaningless.) Obviously, the Bethesda > >Principles are not the only OA protocol, though, so I guess the answer to > >my original question is "it depends." Maybe we don't need (and shouldn't > >pursue) a single universal OA definition or model. > > JE: Purists, of course, will settle for nothing less than the elimination > of all exclusivity, with the important exception of crediting the author. > In such a world, incentives to do something with all that OA content will > diminish, if not disappear. If all (and only) complete articles were OA, > one could imagine someone creating new products based on compilations, > distillations, etc. Eliminating capital from the entire scholarly > publishing enterprise is likely to have unintended consequences that some > OA advocates will not be thrilled about. > > Now, when do we *really* break away from the hardcopy mindset and get rid > of the idea that authors must be cited? That's the bugaboo that stands in > the way of community-based content creation. > > Joe Esposito
- Prev by Date: Re: Different kinds of Open Access
- Next by Date: DMCA hammer comes down on tech service vendor
- Previous by thread: Re: Different kinds of Open Access
- Next by thread: サイト運営者さまへ
- Index(es):