[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Cost of Open Access Journals: Other Observations
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Cost of Open Access Journals: Other Observations
- From: "Rick Anderson" <rickand@unr.edu>
- Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 01:14:28 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
> Libraries don't typically make the end user pay (directly) at all, "Directly" is the key word there. Just because they're not paying at the door of the library doesn't mean they're not paying -- the illusion of "free service" is made possible by the fact that libraries rely on intermediaries to take the money from users and then pass it on to us later. > <...> and certainly not in any proportion relevant to > individually received benefit. This is true for only a minority of the individuals who are actually paying for the services; the rest pay just as much, but then choose not to use the services, and thank heaven for that -- the current system of library funding (both academic and public) is sustainable only because so many potential beneficiaries choose not to benefit from it. Imagine what would happen if every tax-paying citizen or tuition-and-fees-paying student actually made regular use of all the library services to which they're entitled! ---- Rick Anderson Dir. of Resource Acquisition University of Nevada, Reno Libraries (775) 784-6500 x273 rickand@unr.edu
- Prev by Date: June issue of the SPARC Open Access Newsletter
- Next by Date: Re: A COUNTER concern.
- Previous by thread: RE: Cost of Open Access Journals: Other Observations
- Next by thread: RE: Cost of Open Access Journals: Other Observations
- Index(es):