[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Cost of Open Access Journals: Other Observations
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: RE: Cost of Open Access Journals: Other Observations
- From: Carl Anderson <ca25@drexel.edu>
- Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 00:42:38 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
On Fri, 28 May 2004, D Anderson wrote: ... > Economists would argue that the end users of the information, the ones who > ultimately benefit from that information, should provide compensation > commensurate with the benefits they receive. > > Dean H. Anderson Apart from any broader considerations of what economists might argue or any narrower response on the issue of subsidizing access - I can't help but take this one on! Libraries don't typically make the end user pay (directly) at all, and certainly not in any proportion relevant to individually received benefit. That's sort of how and why libraries came about, isn't it? The only model that sensibly matches Dean's prescription is individually negotiated pay-per-view transactions between publishers and end users. Carl A. Anderson Director of Electronic Resources Drexel University Libraries 215-895-2771 Carl.Anderson@drexel.edu
- Prev by Date: Re: A COUNTER concern.
- Next by Date: Re: EDP Sciences (French publisher)
- Previous by thread: Re: Cost of Open Access Journals: Other Observations
- Next by thread: RE: Cost of Open Access Journals: Other Observations
- Index(es):