[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Author Charges are not the only model for funding open access
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Author Charges are not the only model for funding open access
- From: "Heather Morrison" <hmorrison@ola.bc.ca>
- Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 19:19:44 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
There has been much discussion of late regarding the author charge system for funding open access. While this model is definitely showing significant indications of likely success in some areas, particularly in sciences and medicine, it is important to remember that there are other potential ways to fund openly accessible publications. It is likely that different disciplines, types of groups, etc., will find different means to achieve the same end. One other approach to open access is for organizations to publish the work of their own employees, members, etc. A university could publish the work of its own faculty, staff, and students. A government department could publish the work of its own employees or consultants. A society or association could publish the work of its own members. Many organizations are already doing this, for some if not yet all of their information. The organization I work for basically operates on an open access basis, with virtually all of our documents posted on our public web site. In my opinion, it is much more cost-effective to operate in this manner than it is to run a more closed communications system. For example, our quarterly newsletter is published as a pdf file on our web site, as many organizations do nowadays. Adding an authentication system, maintaining a subscriber list, and/or printing and distributing the newsletter would add a very great deal to the work of producing the newsletter, and hence its cost. This is not to say that author charges or organizational publishing are the only methods of funding open access; there are other possibilities too. Let's just keep in mind that whether author charges are the best economic model in a particular circumstance and whether open access is economically feasible are two separate issues. a personal view by, Heather G. Morrison Project Coordinator BC Electronic Library Network ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Phone: 604-268-7001 Email: hmorrison@ola.bc.ca Web: http://www.eln.bc.ca
- Prev by Date: RE: Looking an open access gift horse in the mouth
- Next by Date: ACRL Visting Program Officer for Scholarly Communication
- Previous by thread: Re: Varmus in the Chronicle (RE: Copyright and OA: New York Times and Chroni
- Next by thread: Re: Author Charges are not the only model for funding open access
- Index(es):