[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Looking an open access gift horse in the mouth
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: RE: Looking an open access gift horse in the mouth
- From: Phil Davis <pmd8@cornell.edu>
- Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 19:26:47 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Jan, the revised BMC institutional pricing model you mention is very interesting. Could you elaborate on the details of the formula you propose and when it will take effect? In the next iteration of your pricing model, institutions who publish more in BMC journals will be charged more (but by how much?). I don't think this was made public on the outset of your company's model. --Phil Davis At 05:31 PM 2/4/2004 -0500, you wrote:
Ann, Membership rates are set on the basis of an estimate of the number of published articles likely to come out of a given institution. Initially, that estimate can only be roughly based on the size of the researcher 'population' working in the biomedical research disciplines at that institution. With each year, though, a more accurate picture emerges, although that picture will obviously always lag behind the reality of the current year in a situation of growing awareness and acceptance of Open Access. Our thinking is that we correct the membership fee for each individual institution after we have more accurate estimates of the number of articles that can realistically be expected, using the number of published articles from that institution over the last full year as a benchmark. Our thinking is also that we will count every published article as one, irrespective in which journal it is published, and do not introduce a weighting according to the higher Article Processing Charges for the few very selective journals. See that as a benefit of membership. It is also an administrative simplification that allows us to keep overheads as low as possible and as a consequence, the APCs as well. In spite of ill-informed criticisms that what we charge must be too little to make the operation sustainable, we know that we can do it if we reach a certain scale. We are firmly on track to reach that requisite scale. We even hope to be able to make the average charges lower, with time, if economies of scale allow. Jan
- Prev by Date: Re: Varmus in the Chronicle (RE: Copyright and OA: New York Times and Chroni
- Next by Date: Author Charges are not the only model for funding open access
- Previous by thread: RE: Looking an open access gift horse in the mouth
- Next by thread: NYTimes.com Article: The Coming Search Wars
- Index(es):