[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New England Journal of Medicine
- To: <twilliam@bbl.usouthal.edu>, <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: New England Journal of Medicine
- From: "Dave Fisher" <Dave@library.ucsd.edu>
- Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 19:26:39 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I ran a similar clause by our university legal counsel recently and was reminded that because California law does not speak to the issues of copyright or fair use (it is a federal domain) that there would be no conflict of laws under 12c and any actions brought by the licensor would be actionable in the courts designated in the clause. Like the previous respondent, we would reject this clause. One would have to have something in the state law or Constitution specifically addressing the institution's exposure to other legal venues or governing laws. I'm skeptical that anything like that exists, or if it did, that it would be enforceable. David L. (Dave) Fisher Electronic Resources Coordinator Univ of California, San Diego Libraries dfisher@ucsd.edu (858) 822-1004 >>> twilliam@bbl.usouthal.edu 12/15/03 04:28PM >>> We're a state institution and by state law could not accept such wording. -- Thomas L. Williams, AHIP University of South Alabama twilliam@bbl.usouthal.edu
- Prev by Date: RE: New England Journal of Medicine
- Next by Date: ALA Midwinter: ALCTS Scholarly Communication Discussion Group
- Previous by thread: RE: New England Journal of Medicine
- Next by thread: ALA Meeting Announcement
- Index(es):