[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IngentaSelect usage stats
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: IngentaSelect usage stats
- From: "Michelle Kraft" <kraftm@ccf.org>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 18:30:53 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I do know that BMJ provides statistics on their titles through Highwire. It could be that they would prefer that you get your statistics their way. I don't know. The ability to get stats on Ingenta is relatively new. ___________________ Michelle Kraft Medical Librarian Cleveland Clinic Foundation kraftm@ccf.org >>> mefunk@mail.med.cornell.edu 07/24/03 06:06PM >>> I recently downloaded our library's usage statisticss from IngentaSelect (standard statistics, not the advanced statistics). I had to inquire from IngentaSelect's help desk why many titles had "n/a" listed instead of a number or even zero. I was informed that this occurs for titles where the publisher has not agreed to their journal being included in the statistical reporting. Here is a breakdown of the number of times various publishers occured in our statistics: Taylor & Francis (all imprints): 35 BMJ Publishing: 6 Sage: 3 Oxford University Press: 1 Duke University Press: 1 British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint surgery: 1 Can anyone explain why publishers would not want us to have statistics on how often their journals are used? -- Mark Funk mefunk@mail.med.cornell.edu
- Prev by Date: Re: IngentaSelect usage stats
- Next by Date: Taylor and Francis announce acquisition of Frank Cass & Co
- Previous by thread: Re: IngentaSelect usage stats
- Next by thread: Re: IngentaSelect usage stats
- Index(es):