[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IngentaSelect usage stats
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: IngentaSelect usage stats
- From: Don Taylor <dstaylor@sfu.ca>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 20:23:37 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Regarding Taylor and Francis journals: At ALA I was informed at the Ingenta booth that since MetaPress did not yet supply journal statistics, Taylor and Francis requested of Ingenta that they not distribute stats for Taylor and Francis journals. Taylor and Francis journals are hosted on both Ingenta and MetaPress. Regards, Don Taylor ------------------------------------------------------------- Donald Taylor Electronic Resources Librarian email: dstaylor@sfu.ca Simon Fraser University Library ph: 604-291-4930 8888 University Drive fax: 604-291-3023 Burnaby, BC, Canada V5A 1S6 At 06:06 PM 24/07/2003 -0400, you wrote:
I recently downloaded our library's usage statisticss from IngentaSelect
(standard statistics, not the advanced statistics). I had to inquire from
IngentaSelect's help desk why many titles had "n/a" listed instead of a
number or even zero. I was informed that this occurs for titles where the
publisher has not agreed to their journal being included in the
statistical reporting. Here is a breakdown of the number of times various
publishers occured in our statistics:
Taylor & Francis (all imprints): 35
BMJ Publishing: 6
Sage: 3
Oxford University Press: 1
Duke University Press: 1
British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint surgery: 1
Can anyone explain why publishers would not want us to have statistics on how often their journals are used?
--
Mark Funk
Weill Cornell Medical Library
mefunk@mail.med.cornell.edu
- Prev by Date: ARL Supplementary Statistics 2001-02 Published
- Next by Date: JMLA editorial touches on publishing issues
- Previous by thread: IngentaSelect usage stats
- Next by thread: Re: IngentaSelect usage stats
- Index(es):