[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
IngentaSelect usage stats
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: IngentaSelect usage stats
- From: Mark Funk <mefunk@mail.med.cornell.edu>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 18:06:32 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I recently downloaded our library's usage statisticss from IngentaSelect
(standard statistics, not the advanced statistics). I had to inquire from
IngentaSelect's help desk why many titles had "n/a" listed instead of a
number or even zero. I was informed that this occurs for titles where the
publisher has not agreed to their journal being included in the
statistical reporting. Here is a breakdown of the number of times various
publishers occured in our statistics:
Taylor & Francis (all imprints): 35
BMJ Publishing: 6
Sage: 3
Oxford University Press: 1
Duke University Press: 1
British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint surgery: 1
Can anyone explain why publishers would not want us to have statistics on how often their journals are used?
--
Mark Funk
Head, Collection Development
Weill Cornell Medical Library
1300 York Avenue
New York, NY 10021
212-746-6073
mefunk@mail.med.cornell.edu
- Prev by Date: JMLA editorial touches on publishing issues
- Next by Date: ARL Supplementary Statistics 2001-02 Published
- Previous by thread: JMLA editorial touches on publishing issues
- Next by thread: Re: IngentaSelect usage stats
- Index(es):