[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Sabo Legislation/PLoS editorial
- To: "'liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu'" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Sabo Legislation/PLoS editorial
- From: Jan Velterop <jan@biomedcentral.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 12:12:45 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Dear Michael, Thank you for making so abundantly clear what the benefit and power is of open access. Not so much by what you say, but definitely by what you do. You would like your editorial to be read by as many people as possible, immediately upon publication, so what do you do, you make it freely available! You even *push* it out via email lists. Easy (and wise) for an Executive Director of a university press to make that decision. Open access business models are all about making that possible for any research article that the author feels warrants the widest possible dissemination. Best regards, Jan Velterop BioMed Central PS. Thanks for the kind words about BioMed Central, although the impact of the articles we publish is quite a bit higher, (judging by the citations to them) than you seem to think, and our techies don't think it's 'no-frills' at all but instead, full of the functionality few others offer. > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael J. Held [mailto:held@mail.rockefeller.edu] > Sent: 08 July 2003 22:15 > To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu > Subject: Fwd: Sabo Legislation/PLoS editorial > > Here is an editorial that I published in the Journal of Cell Biology on > Thursday, July 3rd on the proposed Sabo legislation and PLoS. It might be > of interest. It is freely available at the site below and also attached > as plain text: <http://www.jcb.org/cgi/content/full/jcb.200307018> > > Also available on the home page website: <http://www.jcb.org> > > ***
- Prev by Date: RE: Monopolies (?) in publishing--summary for lists
- Next by Date: RE: Open Access and "Membership Costs"
- Previous by thread: RE: Sabo Legislation/PLoS editorial
- Next by thread: RE: Sabo Legislation/PLoS editorial
- Index(es):