[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Confidentiality language and the netLibrary license
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Confidentiality language and the netLibrary license
- From: "Rick Anderson" <rickand@unr.edu>
- Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 17:23:40 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
> It is, I believe, neither uncommon nor unexpected that someone would not > want his or her business dealings broadcast to the world. You're right; it's completely understandable that netLibrary would prefer to keep the details of its dealing with customers secret. The question isn't whether it's understandable or even whether there's a precedent. The question is whether it's reasonable, and whether there's any reason for us to go along with it. It offers the library side no benefit whatsoever and makes it more difficult for us to compare notes with each other. ------------- Rick Anderson Director of Resource Acquisition The University Libraries University of Nevada, Reno "It takes a pretty good 1664 No. Virginia St. meeting to be better Reno, NV 89557 than no meeting at all." PH (775) 784-6500 x273 -- Boyd K. Packer FX (775) 784-1328 rickand@unr.edu
- Prev by Date: RE: Confidentiality language and the netLibrary license
- Next by Date: SAGE Publications Policy for RoweCom Customers
- Previous by thread: RE: Confidentiality language and the netLibrary license
- Next by thread: RE: Confidentiality language and the netLibrary license
- Index(es):